- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:48:37 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 2013-08-26 10:05 (GMT+1000) Andrew Cunningham composed: > There are quite a few assumptions here that don't hold water. > 1. That default font for a browser is nicely legible. Any other assumption holds less water. The opposite implies that someone other than one looking at the screen in front of his face could reliably do better, which is ludicrous, and yet unfortunately the pervasive effect of actual web design in practice. > Considering not all browsers allow you you to set defaults for all scripts > ... it is pot luck what font you will get and whether it is appropriate for > body text. Enough people won't stand for garbage by default that a poor default won't stay that way indefinitely, even if it means replacing, or discarding, a whole class of devices or their firmware or software because of unwarranted obstacle(s) to personalization of defaults on personal devices. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 00:49:08 UTC