- From: Gunther Pilz <gunther.pilz@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:28:29 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 08:29:01 UTC
> It does make more sense if this was only a shrink-to-fit behavior. Your font-size would be your font size unless it didn't fit. No, I disagree. Mainly for one reason that is the "fallback" for non-supporting UAs. Following your proposal the author always has to set the font-size to a higher value (or to the 'max-font-size). So the font-size will be too large in non-supporting UAs. This could be avoided if the new feature will be "expand + shrink-to fit" instead of just "shrink". Think about the Flexbox modul - it is quite the same "functionality". Greetings Gunther
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 08:29:01 UTC