W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2013

Re: [css3-text] editorial nits: index needs tidying

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:36:17 -0700
Message-ID: <5213B721.40209@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/15/2013 07:16 AM, John Daggett wrote:
>
> An index was recently added to CSS3 Text but the entries need to be
> cleaned up to make the formatting of values consistent, remove
> undefined backlinks ("??"), and assure that all important terms
> are in the index, since there's *lots* of terminology used.
>
> Also, I think the structure should be similar to other specs, with
> Changes/References/Index/Property Index in sections separate from the
> appendices.  This makes it easier for implementators to find important
> normative information in places like Appendix F.
>
> Rough order followed in other specs:
>
>    Appendices
>    Changes
>    Conformance
>    References
>    Index
>    Property Index

I've reordered the sections as requested. As Tab points out,
there's not much I can do about ?? links -- but the links do
work, they just don't have numbers.

I'm pretty good about using <dfn> for the defining instance
of a term, so I don't think there's anything missing there.
(If you notice something specific, of course, feel free to
point it out.)

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 18:36:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:33 UTC