Le 19/08/2013 19:51, fantasai a écrit : > There's an issue in the Selectors spec [1] on adding comma-separated values > to the attribute selectors, as syntactic sugar, e.g. > > [rel=next,prev] { ... } > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-selectors4-20130502/#attribute-selectors > > This seems pretty straightforward and desirable to me. Does anyone think > we *shouldn't* add this? 'Cuz otherwise I think we should add it. :) I assume this is equivalent to :matches([rel=next], [rel=prev]) ? Yes, that would be nice to have, and seems easy enough to implement (given support for :matches().) -- Simon SapinReceived on Monday, 19 August 2013 18:58:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:31 UTC