- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:35:03 +0200
- To: "Simon Sapin" <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:59:00 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> * Import these definitions into Level 4. > > I would prefer just defining "screen" and "print", then deprecating > the rest and making them explicitly match nothing. That matches > today's implementations better. Yes, I completely agree with that. These two are the only media types that make any sense to use in practice given what implementations do, and we don't want implementations to move away from that, as media features are a much better tool to push to deal with the differences between various devices / media. If we didn't have a compatibility problem, I'd even like to replace print with media features, but for legacy reasons, we will have to live with it. I still want to introduce media features that make it unnecessary for newly written pages, so that people can ignore media types entirely, and just use features. - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 16:35:29 UTC