- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:18:57 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: Mike Sherov <mike.sherov@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 08/12/2013 01:35 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:01:10 +0200, Mike Sherov <mike.sherov@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, I suppose at the moment I really only have a use case for >> "default value" for "display". My concern here was only isn't that >> we're special case fixing the display problem. It might be YAGNI, but >> default value, while difficult, provides a general answer and low >> level solution to that type of problem. > > So we added defaultStyle to CSSOM because of the above-mentioned iframe hack in jQuery. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0568.html > > If toggling 'display' is the only use case, and 'box:none' addresses > that use case better than .defaultStyle, should we drop .defaultStyle > from CSSOM? If there's no other use case, then, yes, I think so. It's not exactly a trivial feature. But I suppose you could flag an issue first for a bit, asking for use cases. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 19:19:26 UTC