- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:06:38 +0100
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 12/08/2013 07:58, John Daggett a écrit : > Simon Sapin wrote: > >> §8.1 Style rules of css-syntax says: >>> If a style rule contains multiple declarations with the same name, >>> all but the last such declaration are discarded. >> >> It’s actually not that simple: >> >> If a style rule contains multiple declarations for the same longhand >> property after shorthand expansion [refer to CSS Cascade], all but the >> one with greatest cascading order [refer to CSS Cascade] are discarded. >> >> Note: within one style rule, the relative cascading order is >> determined only by '!important', then source order. > > Simon, can you give an example of where your definition is not > equivalent to the current rule in the spec? I'm trying to see how the > longhand/shorthand distinction matters and I can't think of an example. Ok, two examples: .foo { color: green !important; color: red; } In this case, the declaration that is kept (with the greatest cascading order) is not the last. .bar { margin: 1em; margin-left: 0; } Here, even though no two specified declarations have the same name, there is still some duplication in the longhands: the 'margin-left: 1em' declaration implied by the shorthand is ignored. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 07:07:07 UTC