Re: [css3-text] Editorial: CJK codepoints or CJK content language rather than CJK text from fantasai on 2013-08-09 (www-style@w3.org from August 2013)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:36:29 -0700
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <520463BD.1060406@inkedblade.net>

On 06/19/2013 01:09 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on twitter discussions today, there seems to be some confusion as
> to whether the line-break property "applies to non-CJK text".
>
> Perhaps this could be improved if the spec (especially notes) avoid the
> term "CJK text" but rather use CJK content language (linked to the
> definition) or CJK codepoints/characters.

The term "CJK text" appears only in a note, where it means both things
simultaneously (and is clarified as such in the phrase immediately after).

Do you have specific edits to suggest?

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 03:36:56 UTC