- From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 10:23:39 +0200
- To: www-style@gtalbot.org
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>
"Gérard Talbot" <www-style@gtalbot.org> writes: > Morten, Håkon, > > > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/opera/submitted/multicol/multicol-gap-large-001.xht > > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/opera/submitted/multicol/multicol-gap-large-ref.xht > > Please, can one of you verify, confirm that multicol-gap-large-ref.xht is > *not* a correct reftest for multicol-gap-large-001.xht You are right - the reftest is now invalid. This was written for the 2009 version of the spec. > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/multicol-gap-large-001-GT.xht > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/multicol-gap-large-001-GT-ref.xht > > > Please, can one of you verify, confirm that > multicol-gap-large-001-GT-ref.xht > is a correct reftest for multicol-gap-large-001-GT.xht Yes, this looks more or less right. One issue, though: It's displayed almost perfectly in IE10, but something seems to be off by half (?) a pixel or so. Looks like font anti-aliasing. You could avoid the issue by replacing every two-letter "word" with a regular block of width:2em and height:1em with blue or black background. No need for the Ahem font then. Alternatively, you could try using Ahem BOTH in the test and in the ref, but that may still be tricky to get right. -- ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 08:23:54 UTC