W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [css-fonts] grammar changes for @font-face and @font-feature-values rules

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:42:20 -0700
To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130429234220.GA850@crum.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2013-04-30 09:33 +1000, Peter Moulder wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:55:53AM +0200, Simon Sapin wrote:
> > The idea is to extend CSS 2.1 Appendix G,
> I wouldn't bother with Appendix G: for non-normative purposes, examples are
> fine, whereas for normative purposes, it needs to be in terms of the
> normatively defined core grammar in CSS 2.1 chapter 4 that implementors use
> rather than the informal grammar of Appendix G.

The point, though, is to say precisely what the set of legal syntax
is.  This is very different from the purpose of chapter 4, which is
to specify error recovery rules.  So describing the legal syntax
should either be done using prose or using a normative grammar
fragment that fits in the Appendix G grammar.


𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 23:42:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:29 UTC