- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:33:23 +1000
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:55:53AM +0200, Simon Sapin wrote: > The idea is to extend CSS 2.1 Appendix G, I wouldn't bother with Appendix G: for non-normative purposes, examples are fine, whereas for normative purposes, it needs to be in terms of the normatively defined core grammar in CSS 2.1 chapter 4 that implementors use rather than the informal grammar of Appendix G. pjrm.
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 23:33:48 UTC