Re: [CSSWG][css-overflow] First Public WD of CSS Overflow Module Level 3

On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:

> Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
>> So, do you think compatibility with existing overflow-x and
>> overflow-y using vertical writing mode in the wild is not a big
>> concern? Or do you think there should be two new, better-named
>> properties, such as 'overflow-inline' and 'overflow-block'?
> 
> I think we should keep overflow-x an overflow-y unchanged, and specify
> paging effects somewhere else.

This thread wasn't about paging effects, just about how overflow-x and overflow-y interact with writing modes.