Re: [CSSWG][css-overflow] First Public WD of CSS Overflow Module Level 3

Brad Kemper wrote:

 > So, do you think compatibility with existing overflow-x and
 > overflow-y using vertical writing mode in the wild is not a big
 > concern? Or do you think there should be two new, better-named
 > properties, such as 'overflow-inline' and 'overflow-block'?

I think we should keep overflow-x an overflow-y unchanged, and specify
paging effects somewhere else.

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome