W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [CSSWG][css-overflow] First Public WD of CSS Overflow Module Level 3

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:30:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20857.33861.134698.265020@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote:

 > So, do you think compatibility with existing overflow-x and
 > overflow-y using vertical writing mode in the wild is not a big
 > concern? Or do you think there should be two new, better-named
 > properties, such as 'overflow-inline' and 'overflow-block'?

I think we should keep overflow-x an overflow-y unchanged, and specify
paging effects somewhere else.

              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 19:30:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:28 UTC