- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:50:02 -0700
- To: Jon Ronnenberg <jon.ronnenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Jon Ronnenberg <jon.ronnenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Alan and fantasai, > > I honestly don't understand your resentment against the proposed feature. As > to being pragmatic, even if Flexbox was supported today, it will take 2-3 > years before it's viable technology to be used on www, based on browser > history[1] and what's in the pipe-line[2]. Basically we are waiting for IE10 > to be obsolete and Saf6 (iOS6 also uses Saf6 which probably means iPhone3GS, > iPod4th, iPad3[3] is out) and things gets even worse on Android. > > Adding 'white-space:ignore' not only fixes an important omission from the > 'white-space'[4] property (as already noted in the spec), it is also a well > defined and understood issue which can be remedied by a simple shim. > Something that Flexbox can not. However, it doesn't make sense and is > against the idea of standardization to proceed with such a shim, without a > formal agreement or at least a sign of goodwill, in the W3C forum. You can't fix "browsers are too slow in implementing!" by creating more features. ^_^ That's why you're getting pushback. Flexbox is the correct solution, and it will be supported everywhere more quickly than a brand-new feature would be. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 17:50:51 UTC