On Apr 8, 2013 2:02 PM, "Liam R E Quin" <liam@w3.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 16:15 -0400, Brian Kardell wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2013 3:39 PM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org> wrote: > > > > Has the idea of :and() been discussed? > [...] > > That is an interesting idea...i see the rationale because CSS gives us > > comma to OR selectors together. Having said that it feels strange to have > > :and do an OR just for the fact that you have to explain it that way. > > Maybe :where() would be more neutral? Or maybe that's my query > background showing, I'm not sure. > > Liam > There too, i get it, but i think where is overloaded in a system that is about rendering and for those without sql sort of experience probably more confusing than matches ultimately. > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml >Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 18:09:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:28 UTC