Re: [selectors4][naming] Renaming :matches() (was: Proposal: Logical Combinators / Sets)

On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 16:15 -0400, Brian Kardell wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2013 3:39 PM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org> wrote:

> > Has the idea of :and() been discussed? 
[...]
> That is an interesting idea...i see the rationale because CSS gives us
> comma to OR selectors together. Having said that it feels strange to have
> :and do an OR just for the fact that you have to explain it that way.

Maybe :where() would be more neutral? Or maybe that's my query
background showing, I'm not sure.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml