- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:02:08 -0400
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 16:15 -0400, Brian Kardell wrote: > On Mar 24, 2013 3:39 PM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org> wrote: > > Has the idea of :and() been discussed? [...] > That is an interesting idea...i see the rationale because CSS gives us > comma to OR selectors together. Having said that it feels strange to have > :and do an OR just for the fact that you have to explain it that way. Maybe :where() would be more neutral? Or maybe that's my query background showing, I'm not sure. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 18:02:15 UTC