- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:52:42 +0200
- To: "Simon Sapin" <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:55:56 +0200, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > Le 05/04/2013 16:48, Øyvind Stenhaug a écrit : >> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:47:45 +0200, Simon Sapin<simon.sapin@exyr.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >We at least want to inherit font-family, right? The simplest for >>> specs >>> >would be for ::marker to inherit just like ::before does. >>> > >>> >If there are specific web-compat concerns or use cases regarding >>> >text-transform, font-variant or other properties, they could be >>> >addressed in a UA stylesheet. For example: >>> > >>> > ::marker { text-transform: initial; font-variant: initial } >> Yes, indeed, but unless those rules are specified somewhere, I don't see >> that it helps much for interoperability. And Lists already has a UA >> stylesheet (although only informative and for HTML, as usual for CSS >> specs). > > Sure. If any such UA stylesheet is needed it should be discussed here > and then put in a spec. > > I don’t know the details of these issues or if they exist at all, > though. Can you expand? As mentioned, I'm not sure if it's really going to be an issue either. We decided to stick with the majority/our old behavior in this regard, which I believe would correspond to the ruleset you gave above. So I don't know if changing would have given us any web compat problems. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 15:53:16 UTC