- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:11:21 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 01:41:45 +0200, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 2013-03-27 17:53 +0100, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> A while ago, I raised some concerns about how overflow, >> overflow-style, overflow-x and overflow-y work, in particular when >> considering which of these should be used to introduce page >> generation on overflow and box generation on overflow. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/1197.html >> >> As we now have a spec talking about, and extending, overflow, I >> think this discussion is worth having. > > I added this issue as what's now issue 5: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow/#overflow-properties > though it may overlap a bit with issue 4 (which I think I added > only a few minutes before you sent the above, in: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/dd69498547be ). Indeed, there is some overlap between the two, but as they tackle the same problem from a slightly different angle, I think it is fine to have both in the spec. With this (pair of) issue(s) in, I am happy with the publication of a FPWD. - Florian
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 09:11:55 UTC