- From: Stefan Wallin <festiz@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:06:11 +0000
- To: "Henrik Andersson" <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1363972957274.365ff987@Nodemailer>
I agree to both this and the referenced thread. As an author I cringe each time I'm commanded to implement the hideous workarounds available out there.. The last discussion seemed to die off just when steam was building up a month ago. My questions: • is there any previous work on form styling that can be built upon? • how should these issues be properly worked on in a public manner to avoid any responsive image working group similar workflow fiasco? And kudos to Henrik and Antony for lifting and taking the fight for these hard solved issues. A concerned author. Stefan Wallin — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net> wrote: > It seems that it is unclear how to style form controls. Specifically, it > is unclear how radio buttons and checkboxes should be styled. > I did a search on my own as I wanted to do it myself, but all the > results I could in my brief research find boils down to hiding the real > control and providing a fake one by styling a sibling element, usually a > label. > This is clearly troublesome since accessibility technologies can be > confused by these shenanigans. It smells too. > However, how should these controls be styled? While they are quite > varied in their style, they at least all have the same core design: > box/circle + marker. > This situation feels familiar to the one I brought up in February [1], > but is this a case of something that should be implemented using pseudo > child elements? > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0501.html
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 10:00:37 UTC