- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:12:00 +0100
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/05/2012 16:53, Glenn Adams wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com > <mailto:brad.kemper@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On May 2, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com > <mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com>> wrote: > > >> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline > directions, but > >> most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the > logical block > >> directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would > that be > >> clearer? Do we want to switch? > > > i oppose changing, and would like to see before/after retained for > compatibility with existing W3C usage in other specs Strong +1 to that. RI Richard Ishida Internationalization Activity Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 12:12:33 UTC