- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:46:46 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/25/2012 03:15 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > The parsing of the "color" type in attr() restricts it to being a HASH > or IDENT token - in other words, a hash color or color keyword. This > disallows the various color functions. Is this intentional? If so, > is it desirable? I'm assuming the answers to both of these questions > are "no". > > If I'm right, then we should change the "color" type to also accept a > FUNCTION token, followed by anything, ending with a ) token, and still > require it to parse into a<color> type. I think this is intentional. It's not expecting CSS as input, it trying to reuse data from a different format. The color keywords and hash notation is pretty standard syntax for colors, but our color functions are not. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 09:47:21 UTC