- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:30:08 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Actually, I think it should be anything (not just HASH, IDENT or > FUNCTION+args) that parses as a <color> with whatever level of the Color > module is in use. Although it is possible that all future extensions to that > module will use some functional syntax. It will. We don't really have any space to expand except through functions. But yeah, it doesn't make much difference if we just say we accept anything as long as it parses as a <color>. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 22:30:55 UTC