Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> XSL-FO is effectively a dead technology, one which we shouldn't worry
>> about when thinking about naming.
>
> Why do I get the impression you would say the same thing about XML?

I would, though it's not nearly as dead as XSL-FO is.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:33:19 UTC