Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative? from Glenn Adams on 2012-09-25 (www-style@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:43:40 +0800
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, www-style@w3.org, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dpmtwpKXeF9i-3zNVoMkiX5UF5aerKDz9ht1dRb91P-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> XSL-FO is effectively a dead technology, one which we shouldn't worry
> about when thinking about naming.


Why do I get the impression you would say the same thing about XML?

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 01:46:51 UTC