- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:13:51 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > The Conditional spec <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/> is > basically finished. It's only got a handful of issues preventing it from > advancing: > > Issue 1, using the new conditions with @import. We propose pushing this > to level 4. It's not high-priority, so there's no reason to delay the > rest of the spec, or rush its development. Agree. > > Issue 2, the "font_face_rule" production is not defined by Fonts. We > propose just fixing Fonts, and removing this issue. ^_^ Seems reasonable. > > Issue 3, forward compatible parsing of @supports. We believe the forward- > compatible parsing is sufficient here. Testing selectors and whatnot can > be easily done in a way that is invalid per the current grammar. I recall we talked about this in San Diego though I'm not sure we reached a conclusion? I'd like to hear more about this one. > Issue 4, adding an example with !important, can be trivially done. > I'll pick that up tomorrow - it takes all of ten minutes. > > The remaining issues are all regarding @document, and are substantially > harder. We propose pushing @document to level 4, so the rest of the spec > can advance quickly, since we already have several implementors wanting to > release the other features. I agree with this. > > Are our suggested fixes acceptable? Are there any other issues that > aren't yet marked in the draft? If the answers are yes and no, > respectively, we'll fix them and request a new WD this week or next. > > ~TJ and fantasai >
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 15:15:07 UTC