- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:51:07 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 20/09/2012 14:40, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : >> I’m thinking in particular of 6.2’s comment on values that might be >> valid in a spec but the UA "do not have a usable level of support for". > Sane UAs would treat that as "invalid". Of course historically not all > UAs are always sane.:( §6.2 seems to require such sanity in @supports for conformance, but it (or something) should do the same with declarations. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:51:30 UTC