- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:06:13 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, About sections §6.1 and §6.2, is there a difference between: 1. a declaration being 'invalid' (and thus being ignored by the parser to allow old-style fallbacks) 2. being 'not supported' (resolving to false in @supports) ? I’m thinking in particular of 6.2’s comment on values that might be valid in a spec but the UA "do not have a usable level of support for". I think that the two notions should be the same, and that 6.2’s comments should apply to both. CSS 2.1 was less clear on this subject, only I’m not sure that it’s within css3-conditional’s scope to affect the parser. Should this last part go into css3-syntax? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 10:06:43 UTC