- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:05:13 +0800
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 13:06:04 UTC
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > This seems okay to some degree, I just wonder if it's not a little bit of > overkill. Why the need for getter/setter *and* > getDescriptor/setDescriptor? > That almost seems java-esque. > It depends on whether we want to only support the camel cased domain of descriptor names, call it D(CC), or we want to support both D(CC) and the original hyphenated domain (as found in stylesheet) of descriptor names, call it D(HY). If we want both, then we need to have different flavors of getters/setters which make clear which domain they operate with. If we want only D(CC), then we won't need both. E.g., which of the following do you wish to work? (1) descriptors['unicode-range'] (2) descriptors.unicodeRange (3) both (1) and (2)
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 13:06:04 UTC