- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:43:42 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/14/2012 03:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 09/14/2012 02:30 PM, fantasai wrote: >> | A unitless zero that is not already preceded by two flex factors >> | is interpreted as a flex factor. >> | To avoid misinterpretation or invalid declarations, >> | authors must specify such lengths with a unit or precede them by >> both flex ratios. >> >> Thoughts? > > Two nits: > > (a) s/flex ratios/flex factors/ at the end there. > > (b) It's unclear what "such lengths" refers to, in the second sentence. > It suggests that it's referring to something in the first sentence, but > the first sentence doesn't mention lengths at all -- just factors. > Maybe replace "such lengths" with "zero-<length> <flex-basis> values", > or something? Ok, fixed: # A unitless zero that is not already preceded by two flex factors must # be interpreted as a flex factor. To avoid misinterpretation or invalid # declarations, authors must specify a zero <flex-basis> component with # a unit or precede it by both flex ratios. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 23:44:09 UTC