- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:13:55 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
> The feature is much harder to use without named ranges. I think the > evidence in this thread may have shown that it's *practically > impossible* to use without them, given the large variance in detected > light levels. With that said, are you thinking that the lux value as reported by the device isn't that important? Instead just use the lux range name? > As noted, it appears that only three levels are necessary - normal, > dim, and bright. These three levels serve the vast majority of > use-cases adequately. What are the ranges for these 3 names? is that up to the UA?
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 20:14:23 UTC