W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Next step for DAP Ambient Light Events

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:04:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCUwetHfcQKocUSkabSVOV9SyxFbJNYga6-EBxNM-CqCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
Cc: Fran├žois REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, where did we end up on 'named' lux ranges?  Does anyone still see a
> reason for them?  I am less convinced they are useful.

The feature is much harder to use without named ranges.  I think the
evidence in this thread may have shown that it's *practically
impossible* to use without them, given the large variance in detected
light levels.

As noted, it appears that only three levels are necessary - normal,
dim, and bright.  These three levels serve the vast majority of
use-cases adequately.

Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 20:05:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:21 UTC