- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:28:52 +1300
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaDL_v1xbVOsBiDUPFHC4TTvqfgjD6UJ3zgtn4H6q58GQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > This leads to signification issues with CSS Masking. The 'mask' property > is a shorthand property for 'mask-image' and therefore takes an CSS Image. > But it can have a reference to a mask element too. > That's true. Getting both Webkit's behavior and the SVG spec's behavior into a single property is going to be a problem. fill: url(something); /* reference to a paint server */ > fill: element(something) /* reference to CSS Image */ > > background-image: url(something) /* reference to CSS Image */ > background-image: element(something) /* reference to a paint server */ > > The opposite way on two different properties with similar goals. > Who is suggesting "fill: element()" refer to a CSS image? Certainly not me, and I don't think anyone else is either. Do you have a proposal how to do it on CSS Masking without breaking the > implementations on WebKit and Firefox? > I don't. I think we should continue this discussion in www-svg though. I laid out the issues a bit more clearly over there. Rob -- “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 04:29:21 UTC