W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Print, monochrome, and high-contrast

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:23:57 +0200
To: Fran├žois REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>,Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>,public-respimg@w3.org
CC: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55c90278-9a6c-4834-a9cb-5d9d71935cca@email.android.com>
Hi all,

Sorry if by keeping on improving media queries, the csswg keeps on making you even more disappointed that the whatwg won't let you use them for content images :-P

Jokes aside, there is really little I can do on that front. I've tried throwing some ideas in a while ago, but it doesn't seem that this made much of a difference.

Anyway, if you have some feedback about the the new proposed media queries, (or ideas about new ones), this is certainly most welcome. Be sure to send that to www-style@w3.org though, as I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to follow messages on public-respimg@w3.org.


"Fran├žois REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>For what it's worth, the CSS WG just added a way to handle "ambiant 
>luminosity" media features in Media Queries Level 4 [1], and there's a 
>proposal to merge/complement that with the "high-contrast" media
>from Microsoft. Maybe there should be a joint effort here to specify
>need and come with a joint solution. People from the accessibility
>front are 
>still to give their opinion on a possible merge of those media queries.
>I put the editor of CSS Media Queries (Florian Rivoal) in carbon copy
>this mail so that he can follow this thread [2].
>[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/mediaqueries4/
>[2] http://www.w3.org/mid/CDA25383BBDF46DDA7DC093ECA1F01EF@gmail.com 
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:24:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:23 UTC