- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:04:28 +0800
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dS2+d1McD31H7a=UdkgQudJEir+RLCs1J3WZA-CNsxPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > For > > example, say you have a referencing document encoded with JIS X 0201, > which > > looks like US-ASCII except for 0x5C, which, instead of REVERSE SOLIDUS > > (backslash), denotes YEN SIGN. > > Fortunately, JIS X 0201 is not relevant on the Web. > > It’s not included in the Encoding Standard. It is not supported by > Gecko. I didn’t bother checking other browsers. > > I request that the WG make it non-conforming to encode a text/css > resource in JIS X 0201 and make it non-conforming for a CSS > implementation to support decoding text/css as JIS X 0201. The easiest > way to do this would be by reference to the Encoding Standard. Before considering declaring something as non-conformant that may very well be used in current practice, it seems you need to provide some statistics about its current usage. And as I said before, we can't declare it non-conformant for an implementation to support an encoding we would prefer not to be used.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 01:05:17 UTC