- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:49:13 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 10/23/12 5:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> In any case once Gecko reaches end-of-escape it looks at the resulting >>> hex >>> value. If that value is 0, it outputs as many '0' as it hex digit chars. >> >> Ah, that violates the "only emit one token per call" invariant that I >> was told was important. > > I don't see why. The "output" there is not tokens. It's a string. > Specifically, the string the escape expands to. Ah, you're right of course. For any token where an escape is valid, it's valid to have digits after the escape. Never mind, then. >> A thought occurs to me, though - maybe it makes sense to be consistent >> with my preferred treatment of literal nulls, and make \0 return >> U+FFFD as well? > > I can probably live with that too. Given that even FF, which has the sanest treatment of NULL overall, still screws it up in a few places, I think it's probably best to just sanitize NULLs out of the character stream entirely. It's just too hard to ensure that you're not using C string APIs *somewhere* in the chain that'll screw up with the NULL. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 22:50:00 UTC