- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:43:21 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Le 23/10/2012 18:12, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> Multicol is a legacy mistake, but all we have to do is say that the >> multicol properties only apply in block layout, and we're good. This >> was difficult to do before, because we wanted to be able to use them >> in "block", "inline-block", "list-item", "table-cell", and >> "table-caption" - this seems like a random set when all you have is >> the 'display' property. In the new model, these all have the common >> property of using block layout (display-inside: block;), so it's easy >> to specify the multicol limitation. > > Sorry to side-track, but is "using block layout" the same as what CSS 2.1 > calls "being a block container"? In the terminology I'm using, it's "has display-inside:block;", but I think it's the same as "being a block container", yes. I'll need to verify as I fill out the draft a bit more. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 16:44:10 UTC