- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:39:36 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 08:40:04 UTC
> > > Do you have some links to resources or discussions? Or were all > > discussions about that just F2F so far? > > Just discussions at the F2F, but they were minuted: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2012Sep/0044.html > Great, that's already an informative resource. > >> but I'm not sure how it would work right now. > > > > Mozilla already allows to use SVG filters within the CSS of a page. I > assume > > fillings defined in SVG could be used in a similar way. (A pure CSS > solution > > would be nicer, though.) > > Yeah, the cross-hatch stuff will just be a new type of paint server, > so it'll integrate in the standard way (however Images 4 deals with > it). I'm talking about tighter than that - avoiding having to link in > an external SVG file just to use some SVG fragments in CSS. > Agree. A tighter integration would definitely be better. That's what I was trying to achieve with my @pattern rule. I guess at the end we could have an @-rule with the properties defined according to what comes out of the discussion for SVG. Sebastian
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 08:40:04 UTC