- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:46:09 +0200
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Simon Sapin: > > > Simon, you suggested removing lines 03-10 of the pseudo-algorithm. > > > I've reviewed this part of the spec, and I agree. The Multi-column > > > module should remove the concept of 'available-width' and 'shrink-to-fit' > > > from its pseudo-algorithm and just use the term 'used width'. > > So, what is your suggested wording for 'used-width' to go here: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/#pseudo-algorithm > > The text to be replaced is: > > > available-width: if the used width of the multi-column element has > > not been determined when the ‘column-count’ and ‘column-width’ must > > be determined (e.g., if it is floating with a ‘width’ of ‘auto’ as > > per CSS 2.1 section 10.3.5) this variable is unknown, > > If we have a separate definition of the multi-column element’s > min-content and max-content measures, is this condition ever true? I > think not: the used values of column-count and column-width only need to > be determined for layout, after the used width is determined. Is this > incorrect? If we remove lines 03-10, it must be true -- the used width of the multicol element must be known when we enter the pseudo-algorithm. Do you have a proposed text for the specification? -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 00:46:46 UTC