- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:46:09 +0200
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Simon Sapin:
> > > Simon, you suggested removing lines 03-10 of the pseudo-algorithm.
> > > I've reviewed this part of the spec, and I agree. The Multi-column
> > > module should remove the concept of 'available-width' and 'shrink-to-fit'
> > > from its pseudo-algorithm and just use the term 'used width'.
> > So, what is your suggested wording for 'used-width' to go here:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/#pseudo-algorithm
>
> The text to be replaced is:
>
> > available-width: if the used width of the multi-column element has
> > not been determined when the ‘column-count’ and ‘column-width’ must
> > be determined (e.g., if it is floating with a ‘width’ of ‘auto’ as
> > per CSS 2.1 section 10.3.5) this variable is unknown,
>
> If we have a separate definition of the multi-column element’s
> min-content and max-content measures, is this condition ever true? I
> think not: the used values of column-count and column-width only need to
> be determined for layout, after the used width is determined. Is this
> incorrect?
If we remove lines 03-10, it must be true -- the used width of the
multicol element must be known when we enter the pseudo-algorithm.
Do you have a proposed text for the specification?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 00:46:46 UTC