- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:03:55 -0700
- To: srirama chandra sekhar mogali <srirama179@gmail.com>
- CC: Bear Travis <betravis@adobe.com>, Hans Muller <hmuller@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "mvssspraveen@gmail.com" <mvssspraveen@gmail.com>
On 10/18/12 11:31 PM, "srirama chandra sekhar mogali" <srirama179@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Alan, > >I have a question related to shape-inside overflow content >behavior in case of shape-padding. >The explanation and the two diagrams you have given explains the behavior >of overflow in normal case, but >when there is a shape-padding, the expected behaviour is still not clear. >Please clarify on whether the overflowing content should >still avoid the shape-padding area or not. > >Regards, >Sriram Sriram, I've updated the introduction of section 4.4 and the overflow paragraph in 4.4.2 to note that there is a single shape defined by the combination of shape-inside and shape-padding, and it is that shape that is used as the content area. I've also added shape-padding to the overflow figures. Please let me know if these changes answer your question. Thanks, Alan
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 20:04:29 UTC