- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:19:09 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Cc: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com> wrote: > (12/10/18 1:33), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Even if there are no items, you still have a flex line. It's just empty. > > Hmm... that's interesting. Was there a discussion about this? It just makes the model simpler, and is otherwise an irrelevant detail, since flex lines are a spec concept, not detectable by the author. > I noticed this part > > # Every line contains at least one flex item, unless the flex > # container itself is completely empty. > > in "6. Flex Lines", but I think this should probably go into "9 Flex > Layout Algorithm" since it's a bit surprising. It's direct stated in the first bullet point of step 5 in the layout algorithm, and implied by the second. > Also, this doesn't match the inline model, does it? What if we introduce > something like 'line-height' in the future for flex lines? Then we'll deal with the issue then. There's nothing wrong in the future with distinguishing between empty and non-empty flex lines. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:19:57 UTC