- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:26:48 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 09/23/2012 07:20 AM, Lea Verou wrote: >> It’s only a pair now, in the future it might be extended to allow for more >> things. >> For example, Rik Cabanier recently suggested in a discussion we had that >> it might >> be useful to allow an optional midpoint, like Adobe products traditionally >> supported. >> Of course, in that case, a specific relative order would be necessary, >> since they >> would both be of the same type. > > I want to suggest handling that as a color stop without a specified color, > and having that mean 'average the two colors before/after me'. That *is* > equivalent to having a "midpoint", isn't it? That's interesting! It's a logical extension of the current "omitted position" treatment, where the positions get distributed evenly between the two surrounding explicitly-positioned things. I like it. Only problem is that you can't omit the color from the first and last stops, like you can when omitting position. Not a huge deal, though. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 17:27:36 UTC