- From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:30:24 +0300
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Yup, convex and concave are pretty incomprehensible to me. curve-(inside|outside) is definitely more understandable. Or perhaps curve and curve-inset. Or just allowing negative border-radius for curve. On Oct 12, 2012, at 20:16, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > [Lea Verou:] > > >> Anyway, to get on topic: It seems that its initial value (round) is not in the list of >> acceptable values (curve, bevel, scoop, notch). I assume that either it >was forgotten, >> or the initial value should change to one of the four permitted values. [1] > > The definition of curve aligns with the current behavior; today's 'rounded' corners are > in fact elliptical - as you note, x and y can be different though they default to the > same thing - and they do form a convex curve. > > The naming is somewhat questionable since 'scoop' is also a curve and is a pretty poor > term imo. If convex and concave are too tricky, maybe curve-outside/curve-inside? > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 20:31:01 UTC