- From: Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:54:42 -0400
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 03:55:29 UTC
Before I fully understood the syntax, I actually tried to do use those same shorthands, assuming that border-radius behaved the same as border. I'm surprised they've been unspec'd for this long... On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > It's incredibly common that authors need to specify both the top-left and > top-right border radii or both the bottom-right and bottom-left corners etc > (think of tabs, split buttons and other common UI elements). In these > cases, they have to do something like: > > border-top-left-radius: .5em; > border-top-right-radius: .5em; > > which is not too bad, but is repetitive. Instead, it would be much better > if we could use the following shorthands: > > border-top-radius > border-right-radius > border-bottom-radius > border-left-radius > > Which would accept values with the following syntax: > > [ <length> | <percentage> ]{1,2} [ / [ <length> | <percentage> ]{1,2} ]? > > i.e. like border-radius, but with less values. > > Thoughts? > > Lea Verou > W3C developer relations > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 03:55:29 UTC