- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:35:31 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > First, 'speak-as' should explicitly behave like 'fallback' when using > <counter-style-name>. Two scenarios need to be defined: what if there is no > counter style with that name, and what if we end up in a loop. Whoops, I had those details in, but reworded it and didn't restore them. I'll fix. > Second, the property mixes pre-defined keywords and user-defined idents with > the same syntax. This has several consequences: > > What if I have a counter style named "bullet"? This is not a problem with > list-style-type: re-defining an existing style (even built-in) is > well-defined. But with 'speak-as' the two kinds of idents are of a more > different nature. I thought about adding a note for this, but decided against it. You simply can't fallback to a counter style with one of those names, is all. Not a big loss. > Also, can future levels add pre-defined keywords? (What about existing > content what that keyword was a <counter-style-name>?) Theoretically, yes, though it means doing some compat checking. > Finally, whatever we decide language-wide on case sensitivity for idents > will apply here. Yup. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:36:39 UTC