- From: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:49:24 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Hello, The CSS Regions spec has a paragraph that states how this case should be handled, along the situation of a non-existent flow: "If there is no flow with name <ident>, then the block container does not format any content visually. Likewise, if the block container is part of the flow with name <ident>, then the block container does not format any content visually" Firstly, I want to clarify how implementations should interpret these two statements. I see two options: 1. The region block is rendered, but without any flow content going into it? Basically, the region is skipped when laying out the content of the flow. 2. The region block is not rendered at all. The effect is similar to specifying "display: none" on the region element (no renderer is created). Secondly, I think the circular dependency should be regarded differently from the non-existent flow situation. A circular dependency is created by an error in the document's stylesheet while referencing a flow without content through flow-from could just mean it will be added later (e.g. through the OM) and the regions are used to "reserve" space in the page. >From an implementor standpoint I also think the second option is better because it simplifies the rendering and the data structures. Basically, the layout of the flow doesn't care about the regions that create circular dependencies and not creating renderers for them is optimal. Thoughts? Thanks, Andrei.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2012 14:50:20 UTC