- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 20:50:29 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > OK, but as the current syntax is written for the escape non-terminal, it > will definitely match an escaped NULL. I would have preferred to see NULL > excluded from escaping, i.e., always treating it as EOF/EOS for the purpose > of defining normative tokenization processing. Just depends on how browsers do it. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2012 03:51:17 UTC