W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2012-10-02

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:41:49 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e4CHbrzxGZUDG36SWkktdwLhi+ZX9quE621D7hm2iC9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote:

> TV/Mobile/Print Profiles
> ------------------------
>   glazou: Bert raised this, but he's not on the call
>   glazou: Bert suggests moving these specs to Note status, since they're
>           going nowhere.  I think it's reasonable
>   Tab: I agree
>   fantasai: I strongly agree
>   fantasai: We have to update all the references, though
>   glazou: a Note is informational. It's not a Rec track document
>   Rossen: What does it take to put a doc on the Rec track again?
>   glazou: it can come back, but  with the usual administrative overhead
>           of any other REC track doc
>   glazou: we're not changing the contents of the doc
>   sylvaing: will the URL change?
>   glazou: I will discuss with Bert.  We still want the same URLs, but
>           perhaps they could redirect elsewhere or else a notice
>           describing the move
>   fantasai: I don't think it'll be a problem. Switching the snapshots
>             from REC-track to NOTE wasn't a problem.
>   glazou: No objections?
>   RESOLVED: the three docs (TV, Mobile, Print Profile) will be moved to
> Notes

I think the existing docs need to stay at the same URLs with the same
content, and these docs can then be republished at new 'NOTE' URLs with new
status sections. The status sections of the old docs could then be updated
by adding an informative note pointing at the new WG Note version of these
docs and stating they won't be advanced further to REC.

In other words, I think it not appropriate to change the published CRs (at
their existing URLs) to have a new status. The existing CRs should remain
in place as is (modulo adding a note as suggested above).
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 06:42:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:50:29 UTC