- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:16:32 +0100
- To: "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:57:30 +0100, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Test results: > IE 10, Opera next, Chromium, WebKit nightly allow independent order of > 'background-origin' and 'background-clip' in an interoperable way. You > will see this on various pass messages at the beginning. > Firefox nightly supports the syntax described in the current version of > the spec[1] and therefore fails on the attached test. Firefox nightly (tested "20.0a1 (2012-11-29)" on Linux) fails even the first sub-test ("none repeat scroll 0% 0% / auto content-box padding-box"), which indicates that it still behaves the same way as version 17 (which I commented about in the IRC channel during the meeting). So, none of these browsers follow the current spec. Spec says (for the final layer, which is being tested here) <bg-image> || <position> [ / <bg-size> ]? || <repeat-style> || <attachment> || <box>{1,2} || <'background-color'> Presumably, IE/Opera/WebKit all do <bg-image> || <position> [ / <bg-size> ]? || <repeat-style> || <attachment> || <box> || <box> || <'background-color'> instead, while Firefox only recognizes <bg-image> || <position> [ / <bg-size> ]? || <repeat-style> || <attachment> || <box> || <'background-color'> -- Øyvind Stenhaug Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 10:17:16 UTC