- From: Jinlong Zhang <jinlongz@oupeng.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:53:25 +0800
- To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 03:54:16 UTC
I suppose the codes below could achieve same purpose. <style> #myDiv { background-image: url('myLogo.png'); } </style> <div id="myDiv">....</div> .... <img id="myLogo" src="myLogo.png"/> The document have <img /> element and the <img /> has 'src' attribute. I don't feel that need a new feature. Greetings, Jinlong Zhang Jinlong --- Web Specialist skype : jinlong3546 QQ : 237585693 Weibo : http://weibo.com/newwave From: Daniel Glazman Date: 2012-11-21 17:09 To: www-style@w3.org Subject: [css3-images] image() notation and <img> Can I write the following? <style> #myDiv { background-image: image('#myLogo'); } </style> <div id="myDiv">....</div> .... <img id="myLogo" src="myLogo.png"/> expecting the div will acquire the logo as background-image or should the target of image() here be an image format? I don't think the CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Level 3 spec is clear enough about this in section 3.2 and it probably needs a clarification as a note or warning? </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 03:54:16 UTC