> all the different ways CSS 3 has envisioned to do layouts by now This is, after closer inspection as I wasn’t sure whether anything changed, a great example for my criticism: * CSS Flexible Box Layout Module, http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/ * CSS Grid Layout, http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-grid-layout/ * CSS Multi-column Layout Module, http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/ * CSS Positioned Layout Module Level 3, http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-positioning/ * CSS Grid Template Layout Module, http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-layout/ * Alternative Grid Layout proposal, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0047.html *All* are solving very similar problems. Yet *all* appear be on the CSS WG radar, if one can believe <http://disruptive-innovations.com/zoo/customers/CSSWG/Priorities.html>. Why and how, if that is the assumption, would we *not* consolidate? -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 04:23:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:23 UTC